PETERTHEEATER
30-06-2009, 10:05
This one stumped me at first. But, like a number of descriptions in various records the name was mis-spelled as Cocksbriggs.
A small site recorded as C1 tanks total 16,000 tons and it still looks good:
http://i329.photobucket.com/albums/l366/PRACHUAP/Clocksbriggs.jpg
http://www.flashearth.com/?lat=56.65787 ... =0&src=msl (http://www.flashearth.com/?lat=56.657876&lon=-2.827884&z=18&r=0&src=msl)
A small site recorded as C1 tanks total 16,000 tons and it still looks good:
http://i329.photobucket.com/albums/l366/PRACHUAP/Clocksbriggs.jpg
http://www.flashearth.com/?lat=56.65787 ... =0&src=msl (http://www.flashearth.com/?lat=56.657876&lon=-2.827884&z=18&r=0&src=msl)